Comparative Project Style Analysis
New Solutions VS Traditional Solutions
Comparative Projects Style Analysis
Mobile
Solar Energy Container
Compared with
Traditional
Solar Station
Technical Index
Mobile Solar Energy Container
Traditional Solar Station
Project Advancement
Field Deployment Time
1-2 days
10-15 days
Fast deployment
Implementation Installer
4-6 persons
6-10 persons
Less installers
Turnover Repetition Rate
Transferable, reusable 10 times a year
Not transferable, only fixed use
High reuse rate
Installation Difficulty
Plug&Play
Complex construction procedure
Simple construction steps
Modular Portability
Assembly form, modular, easy to install
No portability, fixed position
Modular system
Environmental Impact
Readily transferable
Affected by climate and disasters
Less affected
Comparison with Diesel Power Generator (200KW)
Mobile
Solar Energy Container
Compared with
Diesel
Power Generator
200Kwp Case
Mobile Solar Energy Container
Diesel Power Generator
Environmental Impact
Renewable energy
Contaminant
Initial Cost
High
Cheap
Fuel Consumption（Year）
0
Machine price * 2.5
Maintenance Cost（Year）
Regular inspection and cleaning
Replacement parts, repairs, refuelling
Total Cost(2 Years)
Cheaper than initial cost
Higher than initial cost
Long-term Reliability
High life span
Easy damage
Return Period（Estimated）
≈8.3 months
＞2 years
Rol (Return On Invenstment)
About 190%
/
Mobile solar energy container connects diesel generator： The operation of diesel engines during the day can be reduced, thus reducing CO2 emissions.
In addition, operating costs are reduced.
Smartest Way to Generate Electricity
We are committed to build a globally leading smart energy service provider.
- sales@lehoess.com
- support@lehoess.com
- +31 0641004466
Copyright © 2022 LEHO. All rights reserved.
English
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
French
German
Greek
Hungarian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish